Execution Scorecard

Tech due diligence for game publishing deals

Tech due diligence for game publishing deals scores 35/100 for execution readiness. The recommended next step is Offer three publishers a discounted audit on a current or recently signed deal, compare the findings with what later went wrong in production, and ask whether each would make the audit a standard pre-signing step at the quoted price.

Bottlenecks

  • Studios may refuse source access before a deal is signed, limiting the audit to builds, documents and interviews.
  • Console certification requirements sit behind platform NDAs, so the checklist must be run with the studio's own developer access rather than published by the vendor.
  • Deal volume per publisher is small, so revenue depends on the audit becoming a standard step that publishers and investors require.
  • A broad AI assistant can flatten differentiation unless the wedge is painfully specific.
  • The first release can become a generic dashboard if the job is not named tightly.
  • Needs real buyer access, not only desk research.
  • Needs proof of budget or repeated urgency.

Accelerators

  • Can talk to the buyer before writing much code.
  • Can ship a narrow first-win demo quickly.
  • Can use local-first research artifacts to keep validation moving without a large team.
  • Use specificity as the wedge: one buyer, one workflow, one measurable result.
  • Show proof earlier than broad competitors with before-and-after examples and small pilot data.
  • Keep implementation lighter than incumbent suites or generic AI assistants.
  • Concierge review or paid template

Dated Plan

First 30 days to evidence.

The plan starts from build time and should be re-exported when the founder chooses a real start date.

2026-11-08

1. Frame the wedge

Write the one-sentence promise and test it in the strongest channel.

Proof: Offer three publishers a discounted audit on a current or recently signed deal, compare the findings with what later went wrong in production, and ask whether each would make the audit a standard pre-signing step at the quoted price.
2026-11-11

2. Interview 10 people who match the buyer persona.

Create the lead magnet and use it to recruit interviews.

Proof: Problem resonance: 5+ calls or 10+ detailed replies.
2026-11-15

3. Ship a clickable demo or concierge workflow that produces the first useful artifact.

Build the smallest demo that proves the first win.

Proof: Activation: 25% of demo visitors complete the first-win path.
2026-11-22

4. Run one paid pilot or collect explicit pricing objections before automating the rest.

Delete any report section that feels generic before building.

Proof: Commercial pull: 3 paid pilots, LOIs, or concrete procurement next steps.
2026-11-29

5. Promote to a deeper build plan only after the wedge survives validation.

Run the lead magnet and first-win demo tests.

Proof: Fewer than five qualified buyers agree to discuss the workflow after targeted outreach.
2026-12-08

6. Execution checkpoint 6

Promote to deeper implementation only once the wedge survives interviews or paid-pilot outreach.

Proof: Promote to a deeper build plan only after the wedge survives validation.

First actions

  • Write the one-sentence promise and test it in the strongest channel.
  • Create the lead magnet and use it to recruit interviews.
  • Build the smallest demo that proves the first win.
  • Delete any report section that feels generic before building.
  • Run the lead magnet and first-win demo tests.
  • Promote to deeper implementation only once the wedge survives interviews or paid-pilot outreach.

Builder prompt

Create a dated execution plan for "Tech due diligence for game publishing deals". Keep the first milestone tied to Offer three publishers a discounted audit on a current or recently signed deal, compare the findings with what later went wrong in production, and ask whether each would make the audit a standard pre-signing step at the quoted price.. Use these bottlenecks: Studios may refuse source access before a deal is signed, limiting the audit to builds, documents and interviews.; Console certification requirements sit behind platform NDAs, so the checklist must be run with the studio's own developer access rather than published by the vendor.; Deal volume per publisher is small, so revenue depends on the audit becoming a standard step that publishers and investors require.; A broad AI assistant can flatten differentiation unless the wedge is painfully specific.; The first release can become a generic dashboard if the job is not named tightly.; Needs real buyer access, not only desk research.; Needs proof of budget or repeated urgency.. Use these accelerators: Can talk to the buyer before writing much code.; Can ship a narrow first-win demo quickly.; Can use local-first research artifacts to keep validation moving without a large team.; Use specificity as the wedge: one buyer, one workflow, one measurable result.; Show proof earlier than broad competitors with before-and-after examples and small pilot data.; Keep implementation lighter than incumbent suites or generic AI assistants.; Concierge review or paid template. Link the output to the Idea Builder prompt and do not expand beyond the first validated workflow.